Skip to content

Legal Right to Language

The authors argue that state constitutions should protect a legal right to language for deaf children. Analyzes U.S. and international law.
A baby holds on to an object in order to stand.

Share This Post

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin

The team of authors argue that a state constitution should protect a legal right to language. Furthermore, they develop a legal framework to protect the rights of deaf children. As a consequence, the authors call for legislation to require government to fund programs. The programs would then help deaf children and families learn sign language. The authors say that sign language is the only reliably accessible language. They cite research and other evidence to support their arguments for a legal right to language. Additionally, they analyze relevant U.S. law and international law.

People may also want to read “Why policies should promote sign language for deaf children“.

The web page is accessible for people using screen reading software, but with some difficulty. For example, some links do not have text explaining what they link to.

Click here to show & hide the transcript with descriptions


How did you like this resource? 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)


More Resources to Explore

Do You Want To Share a Resource?

drop us a resource and keep in touch

A tree with different resources like website, email, social media